On a desolate stretch of Iceland’s Snæfellsnes Peninsula, a farmer kneels beside a shallow pit, unearthing a wooden crate swollen with the pungent aroma of ammonia and aged fish. Inside lies hákarl—fermented Greenland shark meat—a gelatinous, ivory-colored delicacy that has divided palates for centuries. To outsiders, burying shark in gravelly soil for months seems bizarre, even reckless. But in Iceland’s volcanic embrace, where winters are endless and resources scarce, this ritual is a masterclass in turning poison into sustenance. The story of hákarl is not just about food preservation; it’s a survival manual written in urea, microbes, and Viking grit.
The Poison Problem: Why Greenland Shark Can’t Be Eaten Fresh
Greenland sharks (Somniosus microcephalus), lurking in the Arctic depths, are among the world’s longest-lived vertebrates—some reaching 500 years. But their flesh is laced with toxic levels of urea and trimethylamine oxide (TMAO), compounds that act as natural antifreeze in icy waters. Consumed fresh, the meat causes symptoms akin to extreme drunkenness: vomiting, convulsions, and even death. For Iceland’s early settlers, who relied on unpredictable harvests from the sea, discarding such a massive protein source (sharks weigh up to 1,400 kg) was unthinkable. Thus began a trial-and-error quest to detoxify the catch.
Burying the shark emerged as a solution. By fermenting the meat underground, where temperatures hover around 4–6°C year-round, settlers harnessed anaerobic bacteria to break down urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide. The gravelly soil, rich in volcanic minerals like sulfur and iron, acted as a natural pH buffer, preventing harmful pathogens while allowing Halanaerobium bacteria—extremophiles found in Iceland’s geothermal vents—to thrive. These microbes metabolized TMAO into trimethylamine (TMA), the compound responsible for hákarl’s infamous rotting-fish aroma. What began as necessity became alchemy: poison transformed into preservation.
The Grave as a Fermentation Chamber: A 600-Year-Old Recipe
Traditional hákarl preparation follows steps unchanged since the 14th century. After catching a shark, fishermen drain its blood (which contains 8% urea, versus 2% in human urine) and behead it. The carcass is buried in a shallow, stone-lined pit (hákarlsgröf) for 6–12 weeks, weighted with rocks to press out fluids. During this skóflun (fermentation phase), microbial activity peaks, reducing urea by 90%. The meat is then exhumed, cut into strips, and air-dried on wooden racks for 2–4 months. The result: a chewy, ammonia-scented protein bomb that could sustain families through volcanic winters.
Modern science validates this crude method. A 2018 University of Iceland study found that burial fermentation lowers the shark’s pH to 9.2—nearly as alkaline as baking soda—creating an environment hostile to Clostridium botulinum and other deadly bacteria. The ammonia, while pungent, acts as a preservative, inhibiting mold. “It’s the Viking equivalent of canning,” says food microbiologist Dr. Helga Jónsdóttir. “They didn’t know about microbes, but they mastered them.”
From Survival Food to National Identity
For centuries, hákarl was poverty food, eaten reluctantly when cod stocks failed. Its reputation shifted in the 17th century when Danish colonizers mocked it as “Icelandic stink.” Locals defiantly embraced the dish, serving it at Þorrablót—a midwinter festival celebrating Norse heritage. By the 19th century, hákarl became a test of Icelandic grit. Children were dared to eat it; newlyweds shared a bite as a vow of resilience.
The ritual of burial deepened its cultural weight. Farmers in the Westfjords still inter sharks in ancestral pits, reciting rhymes to “tame the beast’s spirit.” During burial, some add angelica roots or crowberry leaves—old pagan practices to ward off decay. “Digging up hákarl feels like communing with ghosts,” says Bjarni Sigurðsson, a fifth-generation fermenter. “You taste the land’s hunger, and its stubbornness to survive.”
The Neurogastronomy of Disgust: Why Some Crave the Rot
Hákarl’s divisive flavor—often likened to ammonia-soaked cheese—is a case study in acquired taste. The high concentration of free glutamates (up to 1,200 mg/100g) creates an intense umami punch, while caproic and butyric acids evoke blue cheese. Brain imaging reveals that Icelanders who grew up eating hákarl show increased activity in the orbitofrontal cortex—the region linked to nostalgia—when exposed to its scent. Outsiders, however, activate the insula, associated with disgust.
This split reflects cultural conditioning. Icelandic children are introduced to hákarl via brennivín (caraway schnapps), which numbs the ammonia burn. Over time, the brain learns to pair the shock with reward, akin to chili pepper addiction. Chefs now leverage this duality. At Reykjavík’s Dill Restaurant, hákarl is shaved over rye bread ice cream, its funk contrasting with sweetness. “It’s about controlled rebellion,” says chef Ragnar Eiríksson. “The rot becomes sophistication.”
Climate Change and the Future of Fermentation
Iceland’s warming climate now threatens hákarl’s traditional methods. Rising temperatures (up 1.5°C since 2000) disrupt the stable subsoil chill needed for fermentation. Coastal erosion, fueled by melting glaciers, has swallowed ancestral burial sites. Some producers now use refrigerated containers, but purists argue it alters the microbial balance.
Young Icelanders are reimagining the tradition. Startups like FERMENTÓ use CRISPR-modified bacteria to accelerate urea breakdown, reducing burial time to two weeks. Vegan versions, made from fermented jackfruit infused with TMA, cater to ethical tourists. Yet for all the innovation, the essence remains. “You can’t shortcut the grave,” insists Hildur Hákonardóttir, who buries shark in her greenhouse, using geothermal heat to mimic ancient conditions. “The land must speak to the meat.”
The Ritual’s Global Resonance
As Iceland’s tourism booms, hákarl has become a daredevil trophy. Over 70% of visitors try it, often filming their gagging reactions for social media. This spectacle irks locals, who see it as reducing their heritage to a meme. In response, families now host “hákarl suppers,” pairing it with sagas of survival.
Diaspora communities, meanwhile, cling to burial rituals. In Manitoba, Canada, Icelandic descendants ferment shark in permafrost cellars. In Tokyo, a sushi chef ages hákarl in miso pits, blending traditions. “It’s not about the shark,” says anthropologist Dr. Eva Þórðardóttir. “It’s about carrying a piece of Iceland’s stubborn heart.”
Iceland’s buried shark is more than food—it’s a dialogue with mortality. In a land shaped by fire and ice, where life teeters on the edge of extinction, hákarl embodies the audacity to wrest nourishment from poison, to let rot become renewal. Each ammonia-laced bite is a Viking boast: We outlasted the impossible.
So when you next encounter this polarizing dish, don’t just hold your nose. Consider the graves that birthed it, the microbes that transformed it, and the people who turned desperation into defiance. For in that jarring flavor lies Iceland’s unyielding truth: sometimes, to survive, you must first let things decay.
By Sarah Davis/Mar 30, 2025
By Christopher Harris/Mar 30, 2025
By Rebecca Stewart/Mar 30, 2025
By Sarah Davis/Mar 30, 2025
By John Smith/Mar 30, 2025
By Olivia Reed/Mar 30, 2025
By Rebecca Stewart/Mar 30, 2025
By Victoria Gonzalez/Mar 30, 2025
By Thomas Roberts/Mar 30, 2025
By James Moore/Mar 30, 2025
By James Moore/Mar 30, 2025
By Noah Bell/Mar 30, 2025
By Olivia Reed/Mar 30, 2025
By Emily Johnson/Mar 30, 2025
By David Anderson/Mar 30, 2025
By Joshua Howard/Mar 30, 2025
By Eric Ward/Mar 30, 2025
By Jessica Lee/Mar 30, 2025
By Joshua Howard/Mar 30, 2025